Search for: "David Luban"
Results 181 - 200
of 200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
— Ab Currie, Ph.D.Senior Research FellowCanadian Forum on Civil Justice ______________ [1] The Law Van project is being generously funded by the Law Foundation of Ontario. [2] A longer version titled Strengths and Opportunities for Sustainability: The Mobile Rural Law Van and Winter Venues in North Halton and Wellington County, Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, Toronto, 2023 is forthcoming on the CFCJ web site. [3] David Luban, The Rights to Legal Services in A.A. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Ashcroft, supra, at pp. 71-76 of the PDF file, and the comments on the case by David Luban at Balkinization, some of which he repeated here); embarrassment is simply not a danger to national security (this argument does, however, share some ground with the political question doctrine – which I criticized in an earlier post).For considerations of national security to be properly brought into play, there must be some concrete information on the effects of any disclosure or… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:22 pm
David Luban, Prof. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:11 pm
(I welcome my colleague and co-blogger David Luban to weigh in here.)All of which is to say that I think it's a fairly interesting and difficult question what legal standards OPR should apply when assessing OLC's conduct. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:02 pm
If you can't tell the difference between forcing and pouring... .As my colleague David Luban put it today, this Ashcroft exchange -- and a virtually identical attempt by Steven Bradbury before Congress last month to distinguish U.S. waterboarding from that of the Spanish Inquisition -- confirms "the underdeveloped jurisprudence of the forcing/pouring distinction. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, David Luban argues that “[t]he irony is that filing frivolous accusations with the Supreme Court is itself an ethics violation — and DOJ’s accusations against Jane Doe’s lawyers come perilously close to crossing that line. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
David Luban, Prof. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:12 pm
Most theories of legal ethics utilize what he calls (after David Luban) the “adversarial system excuse,” or the consequentialist view that the lawyerly vices are justified as part of a legal system that is just overall. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:17 pm
And don't forget to read David Luban below, dissecting the Administration's mantra that its use of the enhanced techniques "saved innocent lives. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
"The Vindication of Major Mori" was the apt title of David Luban's article about Major Michael Mori, who represented David Hicks, an Australian detained in Guantanamo. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
XXKF4749.L495 2004 D'Angelo Law Library, Reserve Reading Room Luban, David. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
David Luban asserts that “When serious moral obligation conflicts with professional obligation, the lawyer must become a civil disobedient to professional rules” (Legal Ethics and Human Dignity, 2007, p. 63). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
David Luban For those interested in military intelligence and philosophy: M. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:43 pm
David Luban, Prof. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
In his book Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), Professor David Luban argues that the purpose of our criminal justice system is to protect the dignity of an accused, to prevent the humiliation of individuals charged with a crime. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:53 am
David Luban Non-fiction Poisoner-in-Chief: Sidney Gottlieb and the CIA Search for Mind Control by Stephen Kinzer. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
David Foster Wallace, Tense Present: Democracy, English, and the Wars on Usage, Harper's Mag., Apr. 2001, at 39, https://harpers.org/wp-content/uploads/HarpersMagazine-2001-04-0070913.pdf. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:54 am
Luban (Georgetown Univ. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
After Kant, because human animals alone have dignity they can make necessary and compelling or objective claims on each other (hence reciprocal notions of ‘obligation’ or ‘duty’ and ‘right’), and thus our actions are capable of embodying or expressing the “motive” proper to morality, one that also accounts for the (rational) recognition of the objective worth of others as “ends in themselves. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Luban and the Real Debate About Torture (Nov. 27, 2005)73. [read post]
