Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm
111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
Important links: Prior blogs on Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Links: NWC Amicus brief in Powers v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 2:47 am
In its judgment in Amaghlobeli and Others v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:42 pm
The court’s decision comes just days before the rule’s June 30 compliance date (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:53 am
In the case of Leshinksy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:50 am
Although the court found that the employee stated a claim for retaliation, it denied his claim for damages. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
This conventional wisdom springs from a long-standing legal tradition, originating with McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Last week, in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
The district court concluded that the employee was not a whistleblower under the Dodd-Frank Act and thus did not state a claim for retaliation. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 6:04 pm
Vanguard is fighting his retaliation suit because, among other reasons, he did not report misconduct to the SEC, but the agency maintains that such external reporting is not a prerequisite to a Dodd-Frank claim (Danon v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
It’s cited in Douglas Baird’s chapter in Intellectual Property Stories on International News Service v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
” Grannis v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:49 am
Somers stating that the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provisions only extend to those persons who provide information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the SEC. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
In remarksat recent E.U. conference, he noted that the legal basis for deriving implied powers from the penumbra of other express powers is best seen in the opinion of Justice Douglas in Griswold v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Nat’l Assoc. of Mfrs v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 12:22 pm
"Leidos, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
The Supreme Court effectively replaced the conduct and effects test with a transactional test and imposed a bright line rule on the cross-border availability of Rule 10b-5.In Morrison v. [read post]
