Search for: "Does 1 through 10, inclusive" Results 181 - 200 of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 1:08 pm by Greg Guedel
The response due date depends on the fiscal year end of the prime applicant, with range of 2/15/10 – 8/1/10. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
   But then, so is the Marxist-Leninist order with its core in China, for being either a capitalist fellow traveler (through its markets Marxism), or a front for Leninist imperialism. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Information relating to the FSVP regulation and responsibilities to comply with the regulation can be found through links on the FDA’s FSVP web page at https://www.fda.gov/food/food-safety-modernization-act-fsma/fsma-final-rule-foreign-supplier-verification-programs-fsvp-importers-food-humans-and-animals During the most recent inspection, the FDA found that the company does not comply with the 21 CFR part 1 requirements, subpart L, for the foods it imports. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am by Kevin Russell
EPA, specifically:  to what extent does the Constitution limit Congress’s authority to address environmental problems through legislation that limits the rights of private property owners? [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:14 am by INFORRM
It’s the norm to pay for legal information, through legal databases (eg. [read post]
As antibodies are specialized proteins, they are deemed to be biological materials and, as such, are subject to the provisions of article 10 (IX)[1] of the Brazilian Patent Statute. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
 How does the copyright system ensure that the value of copyright works are recognized? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:15 am by Jeroen Willekens
G 3/08, OJ EPO 2011, 10, reasons 12.2.2, T 1145/10 of 26 February 2016, reasons 5). [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am by Jon L. Gelman
The bill directs the Attorney General to finalize rulemaking to remove marijuana and THC from the schedules of controlled substances and deem the drug or substance that does not meet the requirements for inclusion in any schedule. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Although the requirement for different decisions by two boards in the case of a referral by the President of the EPO (Article 112(1) (b) EPC) does not apply to referrals byboards, the boards should in any case seek to minimise inconsistencies in the case law.56. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 2:35 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the definition of harmful remains problematic: not least because inclusion of ‘psychological impact’ may suggest that the notion of harm is still tied to variable, subjective reactions of different readers. [read post]