Search for: "Due v. Ahmed"
Results 181 - 200
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:37 pm
Circuit Court to reopen the case of Kiyemba v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
Two years later, in Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
However R (Ahmed) v Waltham Forest LBC [2001] EWHC Admin 540 appeared to find the opposite. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
However R (Ahmed) v Waltham Forest LBC [2001] EWHC Admin 540 appeared to find the opposite. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:29 pm
Ahmed Selmouni was represented by Me Marie-Alix Canu Bernard who was not available for comments on the resolution adopted. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
The first is Ahmed v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
The government and the courts believe that this is a special case due to the SAMs placed on Stewart's client, Sheikh Omar Ahmad Ali Abdel Rahman. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:08 am
The case is Wanderlust Media, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 8:07 pm
., v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:09 pm
Seventeen of those detainees, members of a Chinese Muslim minority (Uighurs), now have a case pending in the Supreme Court, to which the Administration is due to reply by May 29 (Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:09 am
President Barack Obama references last week's Federal Court ruling in Omar Ahmed Khadr v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
… According to their legal complaint, Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal and Rhuhel Ahmed claim they traveled to Afghanistan in October 2001 to offer humanitarian relief to civilians. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 8:01 pm
They will be challenging his continued detention beyond Dec. 31, pleading the habeas right the Supreme Court allowed last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 2:40 pm
Under a present schedule, such motions would be due on Friday of this week. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
The petitioner’s merits brief is due Thursday in Winter, et al. v. [read post]
