Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 6,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:56 am
” The decision brings U.S. law into alignment with the long-standing position under English law, as established by Leeds Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant,… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Extradition in the public interest would, however, generally be proportionate under Article 8(2) (Norris v Government of the United States of America (No.2) [2010] 2 AC 487). [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In McCoy v Louisiana, 584 U. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:50 pm
Two years ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:01 am
She has kindly shared the following summary with us: The book examines the approach of the English courts to the question of jurisdiction in civil liability claims brought against English-based parent companies and their foreign subsidiaries as co-defendants (e.g., Lubbe v Cape, Lungowe v Vedanta, Okpabi v Shell, etc.). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
Would the decision have been the same under English law? [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:15 am
Take Kentucky v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miller v R [2010] EWCA Civ 1578 (09 July 2010) IT (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 787 (09 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) English UK Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 (Admin) (09 July 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Airways Aero Associations Ltd v Wycombe District Council [2010] EWHC… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:29 am
feud (n.) c.1300, fede "enmity, hatred, hostility," northern English and Scottish; perhaps from an unrecorded Old English word or else from Old French fede, from Old High German fehida "contention, quarrel, feud," from Proto-Germanic *faihitha noun of state from adj. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
In Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegialii [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), the High Court recently upheld the well-established principle that under English law, appeals against arbitral awards cannot be made on issues of fact. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
