Search for: "Harris v. District of Columbia"
Results 181 - 200
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am
Harris v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
When last I wrote on this website about the plan, around two years ago, elected legislatures in eight states (Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, Vermont and California) and the District of Columbia—comprising 132 electoral college votes altogether (almost half the needed 270 votes)—had adopted the idea. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm
Licenses will be available on Monday, making New Jersey the 14th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow such marriages — provided the new order is only a prelude to a formal equality ruling. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
District Court for the District of Columbia is ruling on the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To date, the legislatures of ten states and the District of Columbia—which collectively account for 165 electoral college votes, well more than half of the 270 needed for the NPV bill to become effective—have passed laws to adopt the measure. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
In Brady v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Bremerton School District, 18-12 Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
District of Columbia, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, where she presided over several major trials. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
A church, the petitioner in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
Bush, (2008), District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., 17-1705. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
” Gold v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Lowell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:38 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 8:38 pm
District of Columbia)). [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:20 am
District for the District of Columbia Appeals Court ruled against Perot and Hagelin. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
