Search for: "Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project" Results 181 - 200 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by Matthew Scarola
Humanitarian Law Project, which upheld a statute prohibiting the provision of “material support” to terrorist organizations. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
The petition reached the Court just a month after the Justices, in a 6-3 ruling on June 21 (Holder v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:37 am by Cian Murphy
This conclusion is a useful starting point for the other case I want to address: Holder v Humanitarian Law Project (see details here). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Cian Murphy
Holder v Humanitarian Law Project is a decision (6-3) of the US Supreme Court on the validity of US material support legislation. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
 I entered law school very interested in constitutional law, politics, and media. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm by Carter Ruml
It is not often that the GWOT affects the world of T&E law, but  the Supreme Court’s June 21 6-3 opinion in Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” In The Hill, David Cole, who represented the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Humanitarian Law Project and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
Humanitarian Law Project The federal government may prohibit providing non-violent material support for terrorist organizations - including legal services and advice - without violating the free speech clause of the First Amendment.Gun Control: McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court last week handed down a decision in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project which has caused very considerable controversy as it would seem very significantly to restrict the right under the US Constitution to freedom of expression. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Humanitarian Law Project to reject the government’s position that the “material support” statute constitutionally forbids non-violent advocacy that is coordinated with organizations that have been designated as involved with terrorism. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On June 21, in one of its last decisions of the term, Holder v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Russ Bensing
”  In Holder v. [read post]