Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson, QC" Results 181 - 200 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
– Mark Thomson Case Law: Cooper v Turrell – the assessment of damages for libel and misuse of private information – Hugh Tomlinson QC Hemming and Haigh: Freedom of Speech and Abuse of Privilege Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” – Max Mosley “Harassment and the Media”: Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann Case Law: “Clift v Slough Borough Council – Qualified Privilege meets Article 8″ – Lorna… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
We’ll take it away (then you can make us pay) – Zoe McCallum “Fake” news versus “wrong” news: a nonideological approach to a smarter readership – Charles J Glasser Case Law, Strasbourg: Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania, Fine over “Jesus” and “Mary” advertising campaign, Article 10 violation – Hugh Tomlinson QC Internet legal developments to look out for in 2018 – Graham Smith   [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:16 am by INFORRM
David Erdos, University of Cambridge David Smith, UK Deputy Information Commissioner Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Chambers 16:00 – 16:30: Coffee and Refreshments 16:30 – 17:45: Session 4: Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Beyond after Google Spain Prof. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
We had a piece on the issue a few weeks ago by Hugh Tomlinson QC (“Leveson, “secret arrests” and the rights of suspects: a question of balance“) and a news report on the Judge’s response to the Contempt of Court Consultation and the reaction of the Sun. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:23 am by INFORRM
” US Freedom of Expression and Media Law Roundup 7 July 2010 Case Law: Flood v Times Newspapers, Reynolds defence fails Case Law: Von Hannover (No.2) to the Strasbourg Grand Chamber [Updated] “Reframing Libel Costs” – Razi Mireskandari Case Law: MGN v United Kingdom: victory for Mirror Group on success fees, defeat on privacy Mosley ECHR Case – the Media Submissions “Reframing Libel – A Practitioner’s Perspective” Part 2 – Hugh… [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The top ten posts of the term were as follows (in descending order) Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Media and Information Cases before the Appellate and European Courts in 2016 How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: EU agrees final text of General Data Protection Regulation Investigatory Powers Bill, Bulk… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Claimants included the Duchess of York, James Blunt, Christopher Eccleston,Uri Geller and Hugh Grant, as reported by Press Gazette. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Our intention continues to be to serve as a “forum” for debating issues and we would encourage readers to offer contributions on any issue concerning media responsibility, media law and the other topics which we have been writing about. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
Two weeks ago, Hugh Tomlinson QC wrote a piece for the Inforrm’s Blog about whether journalists should have privileges, and suggested that an accreditation system could be used to clearly identify those who would be entitled to such privileges. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:14 am by INFORRM
  Neither is it surprising that he should link a privacy law and statutory regulation – as discussed in Hugh Tomlinson QC’s post on “Privacy the way ahead? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:55 am by INFORRM
The Evidence:  Full Audio and Transcripts of the evidence of the “witnesses” heard by the Commission can be found here: Hugh Tomlinson QC Zac Goldsmith MP Max Mosley Stephen Abell Hugh Grant Sir Charles Gray Alan Rusbridger Helen Wood Max Clifford Marcus Partington John Kampfner Christopher Graham Louise Mensch Andy Trotter John Mullin Avril Sanders Royle Jimmy Wales [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Elizabeth Filkin’s new report on police relationships with journalists [PDF link] has been praised by the Guardian but labelled “patronising, bordering on offensive” by the Telegraph’s crime correspondent, Mark Hughes. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am by INFORRM
Events There is an event on 20 September 2011 at the Law Society in Chancery Lane on “Privacy, Free Press and the Public Interest” with Gideon Benaim, Jo Glanville, David Leigh and Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Dr Damian Tambini discusses Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post asking “Should journalists have privileges? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
A new proposal for a “Media Standards Authority” has been drafted by Hugh Tomlinson QC, following discussions between academics, journalists and lawyers brought together by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the Media Standards Trust. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
Today the Committee will have two sessions: in the first, at 2.40pm, the witnesses will be David Price QC, Gavin Millar QC, Keith Mathieson and Gillian Phillips; and in the second, at 3.40pm, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Gideon Benaim and Alasdair Pepper. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:07 pm by Charon QC
  We hope that Hugh Tomlinson QC, a leading light on privacy and other legal matters, and Adam Wagner of 1 Crown Office Row and The UK Human Rights blog – will be able to join us – work permitting. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
” The Greenslade blog has a post about an interview given by Inforrm contributor Hugh Tomlinson QC entitled “Tomlinson – why Hemming, tweeters and editors are wrong about privacy”. [read post]