Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 181 - 200 of 5,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Eric Goldman
Removing Section 230(c)(1)’s protection for pre-booking promotions may not matter much to Airbnb; if a local government can regulate the transaction, it functionally regulates the listings that precede the transaction (my main objection to the HomeAway ruling). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:09 pm by Orin Kerr
Recall that the traditional Fourth Amendment rule was that the police could always watch a suspect in public (no search), but that they could not enter protected spaces without a warrant or some Fourth Amendment oversight (a search). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:10 pm by Unknown
The changes outlined therein included traceability matters of the sort currently at issue, and CII said that it continues to believe that an update of those rules would be the best way forward. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:40 am
Both experts concluded that the assistant principal had signed Nagle’s name to the document.** Essentially the federal district court ruled that [1] Nagle’s speech was not protected within the meaning of the First Amendment because it was “personal” and it was not a matter of public concern and [2] ruled that the school officials had a “qualified immunity” in that, as a general rule, unless the individual is… [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by John Jascob
Peirce said that while she supports FINRA’s goals and feels its investor-protection concerns are justified, the rule filing did not appropriately weight the concerns of due process and the right to earn a livelihood (Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to Address Brokers with a Significant History of Misconduct, Release No. 34-90635, December 10, 2020).Rule changes. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Steven M. Taber
EPA  is proposing to require FCPP to meet a 10% opacity limit on Units 1– 5 to ensure proper operation of the PM controls. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm by David Kravets
The score is 2-1 in favor of the First Amendment when it comes to three federal rulings this month on the limits of students’ online, off-campus speech. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:16 am by kgates
Tex. 2014). *10 But the amendments to Rule 26(b) and Rule 26(c)(1) do not alter the basic allocation of the burden on the party resisting discovery to – in order to prevail on a motion for protective order or successfully resist a motion to compel – specifically object and show that the requested discovery does not fall within Rule 26(b)(1)’s scope of proper discovery (as now amended) or that a discovery… [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am by Ronald Collins
And then there is the controversial ruling affirming a First Amendment claim in Citizens United v F.E.C. (2010). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
§§ 921(a)(20)(B) and 922(g)(1); and (2) whether an individual may be barred from exercising Second Amendment rights upon conviction of a non-aggravated common law misdemeanor. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by Bona Law PC
The SAMR has the power to impose a fine between 1 to 10 percent of the “sales” generated by the firm in the preceding year. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:51 am
The proposed rule amendments would create two tiers of offerings: --Tier 1 – offerings of up to $5 million in a 12-month period, including up to $1.5 million for the account of selling security-holders (already covered by Regulation A); --Tier 2 – offerings of up to $50 million in a 12-month period, including up to $15 million for the account of selling security-holders. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:01 pm by Tom Webley
Article 9 of the Belgian data protection Act of December 8, 1992 on Protection of Privacy in relation to the Processing of Personal Data (as amended) (the Belgian Law), corresponds to Article 10 and 11 of the EU Directive and imposes the obligation to inform data subjects of data processing activities. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The exclusionary rule (in brief) Many students read the Fourth Amendment and consider the text to be fairly simple. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm by Matthew Bush
At its May 10, 2012 Conference, the Court will consider such issues as the First Amendment right to advertise a hedge fund, certifying a class before resolving “merits arguments” relevant to the certification, and whether a new trial is required when scientific evidence is later determined to be unreliable. [read post]