Search for: "In Interest of RC"
Results 181 - 200
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 3:45 am
A case of some local interest from the 6th Circuit. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:04 am
Before you speak with an insurance company that will attempt to settle your case in their best interest, call Thomas and Pearl. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:39 am
Here's the bottom line, at least in the 8th: unless the judge strictly complies with RC 2943.031, the statute regarding immigration consequences â€" which means reading it verbatim â€" the plea is very likely going to be vacated. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 12:20 am
“Well, this was not done by the appellant, who in its preparation brief, prepared with evident ignorance of the formal structure imposed on such brief by article 89.2 of the LJCA, limited itself to invoking the» […] infringement of article 3 and 4 of Law 12/2009, of Asylum, and the jurisprudence of the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the Supreme Court, especially invoking the Sentence of the Supreme Court dated November 2, 2015 (RC 263/2015), as well such as… [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
[RC: The preface and table of contents can be found here.] [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Renvoi relatif à la sécession du Québec, 1998 CanLII 793 (CSC), [1998] 2 RCS 217 70. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
The court further found the adoption was in the best interest of P.L.H., and the Adoptive Parents were qualified to adopt P.L.H. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
Anyway, this case was different: It is akin to the consumer asking for a Coca–Cola and receiving a tray with unopened, labeled, authentic cans of Pepsi–Cola, RC Cola, Blue Sky Cola, Dr. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:28 am
Can’t do it; under RC 2929.14(D)(1)(b), the specs merge, because they’re part of the same transaction. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
The test for merger of firearms specifications is different: the statute, RC 2929.14(D)(1)(b), says that the specifications are to merge if they are committed in a “single transaction. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:28 am
Crundwell owns RC Quarter Horses, LLC, and keeps her horses at her ranch on Red Brick Road in Dixon and at the Meri-J Ranch in Beloit, Wisconsin, as well as with various trainers across the country. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 8:53 am
important; line-height: 24px; } #lee-rev-content .rc-provider { font-family: inherit! [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 4:17 pm
RC 2716.13(B). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:39 am
They became friends because of their common interests in music and movies. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:31 am
(It’s always interesting to contrast the statements of facts in briefs; in Hodge’s brief, we learn that he was getting his GED, helping his father with his construction business, trying to enlist in the military, and, presumably, working on a cure for cancer in his spare time.) [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:03 am
RC wrote in with this Question: ” I’m going to be optioning the life rights to an amazing true story from the man who lived it. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:22 pm
(See South Side Woodwork v RC Contracting, [1989] A.J. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
One problem: the statute provides for a one-year period; the injunction wasn’t renewed after that, so the court holds that Harris had a privacy interest. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
First a refresher: HB 86 included a provision, RC 2929.14(C)(4), which was a word-for-word rewrite of the consecutive sentencing provision struck down in 2006 by State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Daigle [1989] 2 RCS 530 La question soulevée par ce pourvoi est celle de la validité d’une injonction interlocutoire interdisant à Chantal Daigle de se faire avorter. [read post]
