Search for: "In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure"
Results 181 - 200
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
" Here's a link to the governing opinion from the Court of Criminal Appeals, Ex Parte Valle, which held the habeas rules under the Code of Criminal Procedure don't apply but a constitutional right still exists. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:59 pm
Florida is not the only state with these tough rules. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:02 am
"It's the best criminal justice system in the world," Vicki Rios-Martinez said, "as long as you're a criminal. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:30 am
Therefore, the Court chose not to ignore a procedural problem that arose during the case’s litigation in the Florida courts, which had held that they couldn’t rule on the merits of Sullivan’s challenge because it came too late. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
Florida DUI Laws If you’re facing DUI charges in Florida, it’s important to understand the possible outcomes in your case. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:41 am
Constitution states: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Bermudez, No. 06-5119 Conviction for possession of firearm by a felon is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in admitting police testimony as to drug-related statements made by defendant; 2) the use of a "blind strike" method in jury selection was both constitutional and consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(b); and 3) comments made during the government's closing arguments were not unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 9:39 pm
View the 2009 version here | 2003 Full PDF Version The Citizen's Rule Book | Archived Documents All the text below is from the 2009 version. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Page, No. 06-3800 A conviction for conspiracy to import cocaine and marijuana is affirmed over a claim that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(G) by not informing defendant of, and making sure he understood, the nature of the charge to which he pled guilty. . [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:08 am
A new bill in Florida is working its way through the legislature which will require all registered sex offenders to provide all telephone numbers when they register. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:02 am
They're withheld, he said, because they may inhibit Hecker's ability to defend himself against the criminal charges. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
In re Fidler ,(Bkrtcy.D.Nev.) [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
have, in my opinion, a tougher ethical dilemma than the standard municipal or superior court judge because the job is, essentially, to get ALL the facts necessary to make a determination that fits within the confines of the law, with the added difficulty of ensuring that a claimant gets all that the law entitles him or her to.The liberality of evidentiary rules in administrative law proceedings makes the job so much more difficult than the disciplined and strict rules of civil or… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:07 am
We put in some language that hopefully lets the bad guys know we’re looking over their shoulders. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 7:59 am
Ayo & Iken Attorneys handle a plethora of family and criminal law cases throughout each year. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
The revised FINRA Rule 9520 Series established procedures applicable to firms and associated persons subject to the additional statutory disqualifications as a result of the adoption of the revised definition of disqualification. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
General rule: no surprises. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
Say that you’re involved in a court case — as a plaintiff, as a civil defendant, as a criminal defendant, or perhaps even as a nonparty. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The En Banc Ruling The en banc Court disagreed. [read post]
