Search for: "In re Coon"
Results 181 - 200
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
” (Citing and quoting from In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1163-1166.) [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
The Court came down with In re Marriage of Valli (2014) __ C4th ___; Case No. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Denkowski re-administered the WAIS-III and Mr. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Voters in over 50 countries will go to the polls in 2024. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
Phillips’ dissenting opinion explained: Jonathan Coon started the business that would become 1-800 Contacts in 1992 from his college dormitory room with just $50 to his name, seeking to reduce prices, improve service, and provide a better customer experience for contact lens consumers. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
On August 11, 2015, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a 145-page “Preliminary Discussion Draft” of “Proposed Updates to the CEQA Guidelines” (the “Discussion Draft”). [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am
In a published opinion filed August 19, 2021, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court that found fault with the EIR for an improvement project within the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument portion of the Angeles National Forest. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
On November 7, 2016, the Third District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion mostly upholding the EIR for a 48.75-acre, 328-unit residential infill project (known as McKinley Village) against various CEQA challenges, and finding the Project to be consistent with the City of Sacramento’s general plan. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
” (Quoting In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1161-1162.) [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
” (Citing In re Baycol Cases I & II (2011) 51 Cal.4th 751, 762, fn. 8.) [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
On May 7, 2015, the Sixth District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion addressing numerous issues of interest under CEQA’s “fair argument” test for preparing an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma County’s use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the County’s rural Knights Valley area. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:20 am
” (Citing In re Bay-Delta, at 1167.) [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm
Cakewalk, minstrelsy, “coon” songs. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Mark Kelly, Maggie Hassan, Joe Manchin, Chris Coons, Kyrsten Sinema, and Jon Tester received a combined total of nearly $333,000 from lobbyists, PACs, and lobbying firms affiliated with Exxon over the past decade. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
In a partially-published, 150-page slip opinion resolving appeals in consolidated cases, and filed February 25, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a trial court decision finding CEQA defects in the 1800-plus page EIR prepared for Kern County’s adoption of an ordinance designed to provide a streamlined, ministerial permitting process for new oil and gas wells in the county. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
In a published opinion filed December 6, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed in part and affirmed in part the trial court’s judgment denying writ petitions in consolidated actions challenging the EIR for a major state government project affecting the Historic State Capitol Building and Annex in Sacramento. [read post]
