Search for: "Jay v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
") AC30329 - State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
This article was authored by Jay Lessler, Esq., of Blank Rome LLP The Supreme Court on April 18, 2012, held in Kappos v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
By Jay G. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
More interesting to me is the sentencing issue raised in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:52 am
New York State Employment Relations Bd., 2019 WL 4491669 (N.Y. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:37 am
"
"The trial can be read in many ways: as gun victim versus gun seller, as city versus country, as red state versus blue state, and, as a version of David v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
See, e.g., Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:43 am
" In this excerpt, Loftus describes her testimony in a pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:51 am
" The NYT states that: "The first of the [interrogation] memos from August 2002 was signed by Jay S. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:32 am
Jay Weaver writes an in-depth piece about the case here. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court extended the Sixth Amendment guarantee to state felony cases in 1963’s Gideon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
The ACLJ is planning to file an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm
Ominously, in his recent judgment in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v GEDI Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) Jay J noted: “Only the Second Defendant saw fit to raise a forum non conveniens challenge in advance of 1 January 2021 and the relevant EU regulation no longer applying… I refuse this application without prejudice to the Second Defendant’s ability to restore it at an appropriate time should the need arise. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
The source of the disagreement stems from public school funding in light of recent state Supreme Court case McCleary v. [read post]