Search for: "Johnson v. People" Results 181 - 200 of 2,620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2015, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The authors of the report observed that the Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:46 am
Contents include:Robert Kolb, Digging Deeper into the “Plausibility of Rights”-Criterion in the Provisional Measures Jurisprudence of the ICJ Emanuele Cimiotta, Parallel Proceedings before the International Court of Justice and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Simon Weber, Demystifying Moral Damages in International Investment Arbitration Juan-Pablo Perez-Leon-Acevedo, Reparation Modalities at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) Mwiza Jo… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:17 pm by Karen Gullo
”For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/johnson-v-proctorio-complaintFor more on proctoring surveillance:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/08/proctoring-apps-subject-students-unnecessary-surveillance Contact:  CaraGaglianoStaff Attorneycara@eff.org [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, “each case is fact specific” (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of “the whole incident” (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
Johnson, No. 05-1444, remands based on a petition for rehearing, which was held in abeyance based on the SCOTUS's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
And as if that wasn't enough, many of the people in gover [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am by Suzanne A. Luban
§ 924(c), applying the reasoning of two prior High Court cases on this topic, Johnson v. [read post]