Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 181 - 200 of 16,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2022, 8:37 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:01 am by Antonio Leandro
Speakers include academics and practitioners (Massimo V. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:13 pm
Trial Court Properly Granted Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment in Class Action Challenging Infertility Treatment Benefits because California Law Requires only that Blue Cross “Offer” such Coverage on Terms Negotiated with Employer, not that the Insurance Benefits Provide “Full” Coverage for Infertility Treatments California Appellate Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Blue Cross of California alleging for… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Kate Fort
Civil Rights Laws, and State Tort Law; 2. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ also agreed with statements made by Jacob LJ in Markem v Zipher [2005] EWCA Civ 267 that cross-examination on key evidence is important for procedural fairness, not just from the perspective of the parties, but also the witnesses. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court heard argument for the second time in the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
The US Supreme Court today issued a new ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 5:09 am by SHG
The Sixth Circuit’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:31 pm by Daily Record Staff
Tax law — Hotel rental taxes — Refundability Appellee/cross-appellant Lockheed Martin sought a refund of the hotel rental taxes it paid over the course of three years to appellant/cross-appellee Montgomery County in connection with a facility at its corporate headquarters that offers sleeping accommodations to employees and guests who pay for overnight stays. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Danielle Wild
  As the Court said in citing past cases, “These cases stand for the unremarkable proposition that law enforcement witnesses should be treated in the same manner as any other prosecution witness for purposes of cross-examination. [read post]