Search for: "Lawrence v. Florida"
Results 181 - 200
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 7:55 am
The ruling in Meadoux v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:42 pm
A split Ninth Circuit panel in Fred Lawrence Robinson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has coverage. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
Aldrich v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Florida, 05-8820 While Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:28 am
Occasionally, “rational basis with teeth” finds laws lack even a legitimate purpose – Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:18 am
Kansas Solicitor General Toby Crouse (Art Lien) Earlier, Justice Elena Kagan had questioned Kansas Solicitor General Toby Crouse about a comparison to Florida v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
Race to the Bottom contributor Susan Beblavi unpacks the Eleventh Circuit’s semi-recent opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Veugeler, Cardiovascular Sciences, Inc., and Lawrence H. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
” Michael Leahy of the Washington Post profiles former Solicitor General Paul Clement, who will serve as counsel for Florida and the other states challenging the law as unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
The authors thank Lawrence O. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
The defendants in US v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:15 pm
” [via Lexisone] Noncapital of note: Ex parte Lawrence James Napper, 2010 Tex. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:45 am
The most recent opinion JCG discusses is Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
While serving as attorney general, Pryor wrote a brief in defense of the Texas law banning sodomy that was later struck down in Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
We have Justice Barrett who joined the Alito opinion and a concurring opinion by Justice Thomas that expressly suggests that decisions like Obergefell, Griswold and Lawrence need review. [read post]
