Search for: "Levy v. Levy" Results 181 - 200 of 3,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Katherine Shaw
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am by Karen Tani
Over at Balkinization, an interesting conversation is unfolding on the uses of history in Supreme Court decisionmaking, especially as pertains to the recent Haaland v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Use in content moderation—deciding what to take down—v. using in recommendation—do you have to guard against addiction in recommendation? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen) and Oliver Edwards are defending against the claims (in Joe Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Wolff, Cogency, Seriousness, Cohesion, and Importance: Assessing the Strasbourg Case-Law on Religion or Belief, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2023, 00, 1–20).Douglas Mulliken, “It’s not just money; you are investing in your identity”: Israel, the Jewish Diaspora, and the Israel Bonds Program, (May 11, 2023).Dimitry Gegenava, Insults to Religious Feelings v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Under Article I of the Constitution as originally ratified, Congress could only levy “direct taxes” if such taxes were “apportioned among the several States,” meaning in proportion to their populations. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
The ‘broad interpretation’ is that it encompasses charges incurred because of the way that the goods were actually carried and lost, so that the cargo claimant can recover excise duty levied on goods lost in transit. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
Levi Strauss & Co., 986 F.2d 970, 976 n. 4 (5th Cir.1993)). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:21 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Below, you can explore these rights and the objections levied against them. [read post]