Search for: "Long v. Clark"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:47 pm
Thus, although petitioners' effort to resolve their concerns through negotiations directly with Long Energy is commendable, their failure to pursue any legal remedy while construction of the facility proceeded to near completion right before [*3]their eyes must result in dismissal of this proceeding (see Matter of Clarke v Town of Sand Lake Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 52 AD3d 997, 999-1000 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 707 [2008]; Marlowe v Elmwood, Inc., 34 AD3d 970,… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
Clark. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:48 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Versloot Dredging BV v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am
Clark County School Dist. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
Jim Oleske is a professor of law at Lewis & Clark Law School. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
The copyrightability of clothing and other useful articles had long been an issue without much direction, however, in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:25 pm
According to the 2002 case Morris v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
" The Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
In Fry v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
All of that may change, though, depending on the outcome of Connick v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Miner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:15 am
Sources: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/regulations/hazardous-materials https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/893/v/54 The post Understanding the Extreme Dangers of Hazmat Truck Accidents appeared first on Herrling Clark Law Firm. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
The government’s argument ended with a long discussion of, essentially, Chief Judge Everett’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The decision purports to affirm the long-followed Second Circuit decision in Gartenberg v. [read post]
