Search for: "Lopez v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm
CAAF’s third and final oral argument on Monday is in the “unusually interesting” Article 62 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:17 am
As reported here at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court in Lopez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:59 am
In its decision today in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:52 pm
Carr v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:03 pm
" A sentiment that I personally happen to agree with.But then he drops a footnote that says: "Unlike dogfighting, which is illegal everywhere in the United States, cockfighting remains legal in Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
In many cases, there's indeed no such state-created right. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:15 am
Yesterday, I did a post about the immediate impact of the United States Supreme Court's recent opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Government computer deportation records admitted under public records hearsay exception and did not violate the Confrontation Clause, in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:50 pm
On a night when CAAF released its blockbuster opinion in Lopez de Victoria, we can't expect many people to want to go see the small indie release of United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
The petition of the day is: Lopez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:19 am
State of Hawaii, et al. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:28 am
For publication opinions today (6): In Magdalena Lopez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:06 pm
Lopez, 514 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
” Free Enterprise Fund thus reminds me a bit of United States v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:58 am
Lopez-Mendoza), this stop rose to the level of a due process violation. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
In McAllen Hospitals LP et al. v. [read post]
