Search for: "MARY ST. FOOD " Results 181 - 200 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 12:43 pm
Dobson and to those gathering this week in St. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
Dustin Howes is currently Assistant Professor of Political Science at St. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Sehm, a police officer with the city of Batavia, county of Genesee 665 S5374A MALTESE -- Establishes a task force on toll plaza air quality 664 S5246A PADAVAN -- Relates to safety requirements during excavation, insurance for construction or demolition operations and support of adjoining structures during excavation 663 S5191 FARLEY -- Authorizes the Village of St. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 12:46 am
"Also standing in the cold protesting the death penalty was Sister Marie McGloin of St. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
In a footnote, Chairman Battista, citing his dissent in Provena St. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. (17-CA-22964; 350 NLRB No. 60) St. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Zebrowski, member of the assembly, for the balance of his unpaid annual compensation 607 A8761 Young -- Relates to bonds of the NYS medical care facilities finance agency 606 A8692C Weinstein (MS) -- Provides that a claim and notice of intention to file a claim in the court of claims need not include the total sum claimed in personal injury and death actions 605 A8664A Canestrari -- Provides for the Beacon Institute Inc. as a public authority for… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Federal courts have uniformly refused to imply a private cause of action under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.Martin v. [read post]