Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 181 - 200 of 16,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
Specifically, according to the Guidelines "[t]he applicant must remove any inconsistencies by amending the description either by deleting the inconsistent embodiments or marking appropriately so that it is clear that they do not fall within the subject-matter for which protection is sought" (F-IV-4.3). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm by Glenn Reynolds
After all, the release at JFK marked the second time, in a matter of months, that Awlaki wriggled free despite the heavy cloud of 9/11 suspicion that hovered over him.” [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  GL couldn’t find any authority holding that patent marks can’t be displayed when a product is used in a manner potentially not covered by the patents. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
We don't deal with FDA regulatory matters that often, and with the criminal side even less,... [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:27 pm by Tamera H. Bennett
 Size Matters For Trademarks On ClothingTypically the smaller and more discrete a mark is used on clothing, the more likely the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
Earlier today, the General Court (GC) issued a keenly-awaited ruling (T‑307/17), in which it upheld the earlier decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (R 1515/2016-2), and found this three-stripe EU trade mark (EUTM) owned by adidas:invalid. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:11 pm by Lara
Just because someone or something (like a saying) is “famous” doesn’t mean it’s fair game for all to use as a mark. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
SThe matter of inconsistency arose:Finally, no matter the government’s interest, it cannotmeet the fourth prong of Central Hudson. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:44 pm
"This is the latest appeal in a longstanding, particularly acrimonious probate matter involving the Mark Hughes Family Trust (trust). . . . [read post]