Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 181 - 200
of 832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am
McConnell drafted a bill that included a $2k stimulus check and a repeal of Section 230, but it never got a vote. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
Hundreds of people participated in what Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell condemned as a “failed insurrection” and, as Bobby Chesney described on the National Security Law Podcast, the events included a “cartoonish avalanche of crimes. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
The Court could have easily GVR'd the 6th Circuit's panel, and stated that it did not faithfully apply Diocese. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
And the nature of the business conducted at those ordinary sessions — whether, for example, Senators must vote on nominations, or may return to their home States to meet with their constituents — is a matter for the Senate to decide. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Kim, Commentary on Burwell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
United States). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am
The NTIA Broadband USA main page features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs (scroll down to the map and click on a state). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
McConnell—one of the top Religion Clauses scholars in the country—was willing to pass along some thoughts on the Fulton oral argument: The Supreme Court heard oral argument Wednesday in Fulton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:50 am
What California v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Not content with those spoils, Mitch McConnell and the GOP-controlled Senate have played hardball to gain still further advantage. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
For example, the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
For example, the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:19 pm
If one treated Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Writing in dissent in Comptroller v. [read post]
