Search for: "Neil Siegel"
Results 181 - 200
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
If functional concerns are stripped out of the political question doctrine in the service of formalism, they may well reemerge at the merits stage, something that Neil Siegel and I suggested in a recent article on Noel Canning in the Supreme Court Review. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:09 am
In March 2020, Justice Neil Gorsuch suggested that the courts, “charged with the independent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress has enacted,” should not defer what he called “bureaucratic pirouetting. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:20 am
In addition to Dodson’s own essay, the book includes contributions by, among others, Thomas Goldstein, Lani Guinier, Robert Katzmann, Herma Hill Kay, Linda Kerber, Dahlia Lithwick, Neil and Reva Siegel, Nina Totenberg, and Joan Williams. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:35 pm
For one thing, the Court could easily also set out some limiting principles on the taxing power, along the lines sketched nicely by Bob Cooter and Neil Siegel, that would be fully consistent with § 5000A. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Neil Siegel and I elaborated this argument earlier in the year in the Yale Law Journal Online. 2) Tomorrow the Court will turn to the merits of the challenges to the minimum coverage provision. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:25 pm
As Neil Siegel and I explained in our Anti-Injunction Act article, that particular juxtaposition is difficult to reconcile with the Court's precedents in this area; yet the government advanced the argument anyway. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:04 am
One of the things that is different about the constitutional law casebook that I have the honor to co-edit, in its present version with Jack, Akhil Amar, and Riva Siegel (though I remain eternally grateful to Paul Brest for his original vision and kindness in asking me to join him in the second edition), is that it includes hefty excerpts from the Lincoln-Douglas debates. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:39 am
Readers interested in a broad conversation could read Jack Balkin, Mark Tushnet, Ilya Somin, Josh Blackman, Neil Siegel, and David Super, as well as a responseto my initial essay from Calabresi and Hirji themselves. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm
Leading proponents of this variant of Internet pessimism include: Neil Postman (Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology), Andrew Keen, (The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture), Lee Siegel, (Against the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob), Mark Helprin, (Digital Barbarism) and, to a lesser degree, Jaron Lanier (You Are Not a Gadget) and Nicholas Carr (The Big Switch and The Shallows). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Writing about Hellerin the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Reva Siegel explained how “[t]he New Right embraced originalism as the jurisprudential vehicle for . . . [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
I've made this point in my forthcoming Michigan article on the Commerce Clause, and it is a central claim of Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter's forthcoming Stanford article "Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8" [which, unfortunately, does not seem to be currently posted on SSRN]Put differently, when a federal statute solves a genuine collective action problem, courts should give Congress the benefit of the doubt in interpreting… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
US lawyer Norman Siegel told BBC News he was at an “exploratory phase” of examining evidence that had emerged in the UK to see if US federal laws or New York state laws may have been violated. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:29 pm
This is what always drives me batty when reading the work of Net pessimists like Neil Postman, Lee Siegel, Andrew Keen, Jaron Lanier, etc. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Writing about Hellerin the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Reva Siegel explained how “[t]he New Right embraced originalism as the jurisprudential vehicle for . . . [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
Other contributors include Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, Richard Epstein, Neil Siegel, and Linda Greenhouse, among others. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Special thanks to Professor Neil S. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 10:47 am
Negroponte In his 1992 anti-technology screed Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, the late social critic Neil Postman greeted the unfolding Information Age with a combination of skepticism and scorn. [read post]
