Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 181 - 200 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The New York Times remained unimpressed, stating, “So now we get to replace Oxford comma pedantry with semicolon pedantry. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language MSN – Peter Baker and Michael Shear (New York Times) | Published: 8/4/2019 At campaign rallies before last year’s midterm elections, President Trump repeatedly warned that America was under attack by immigrants heading for the border. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
New York, the court for the first time suggested that the First Amendment applied to the states through the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
The High Court noted that the actual malice standard in the ATSA was patterned after New York Times Co v Sullivan, which requires material falsity, and Congress presumably meant to incorporate it into the ATSA’s immunity exception and did not mean to deny immunity to true statements made recklessly. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In New York Times v Sullivan ((1964) 376 US 254) the US Supreme Court held that because of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution a public official could not obtain damages for defamation in relation to his official conduct, unless actual malice could be proved ie that the maker of the statement knew it to be false or was reckless as to its truth. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
  The same First Amendment protection equally precludes private suits under New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Jillian Stonecipher
Robert Welch, Inc.), and in many cases with actual malice (New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 116 AD3d 740, 741, quoting Loevner v Sullivan & Strauss Agency, Inc., 35 AD3d 392, 393). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am by Mike Madison
Fox Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. [read post]