Search for: "New York v. Class" Results 181 - 200 of 6,643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am by Robert Fuller
The waiver at issue, which is included in the record on appeal (Docket 22-1744, Doc. 29-2, page 232 of 235), provides for exclusive jurisdiction in New York, application of New York substantive law and states that “[a]ny disputes . . . will be handled individually without any class action. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
New York Rifle & Pistol Association, which established that firearms laws must conform with the nation’s “historical tradition of firearm regulation. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:01 am by freda
For example, New York City’s Local Law 144 recently came into force, creating requirements for employers using automated employment decision tools (see our bulletin discussing these laws here). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:47 am by Mark Ashton
In 37 states (including New York) recreational use is allowed. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”They certainly put Lincoln Place in its place.# # #DECISIONCollins v 527 Lincoln Place, LLC [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 12:31 pm by Class Action Defense
District Court for the Southern District of New York approving a class action settlement, and … Continue reading "Read It And Weep, Subscribers – Attorneys’ Fee Award Delays Approval Of NYT Settlement  " [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 12:31 pm by Class Action Defense
District Court for the Southern District of New York approving a class action settlement, and … Continue reading "Read It And Weep, Subscribers – Attorneys’ Fee Award Delays Approval Of NYT Settlement  " [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
My prior op-eds in the New York Times, of course, garnered much more attention than that. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
New in the American Journal of Legal History and Oxford Academic: Limping Marriages: Race, Class, and the Rise of Domicile-Based Divorce Jurisdiction in the British Empire, by Priyasha Saksena. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:21 pm by Phillips & Associates
Our team of New York lawyers has spent many years fighting for the rights of pregnant New York workers, and we are eager to discuss your situation with you. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
” In his Memorandum, Chesebro then grossly misrepresents what I wrote in my constitutional law treatise on the power of one Congress, through legislation, to bind a future Congress’s ability to pass new legislation (American Constitutional Law, 3d ed., vol.1, §2-3, at 125-26 n.1 (2000)). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
The Server Test has already faced opposition in courts outside the Ninth Circuit, with some judges in the Southern District of New York rejecting its application. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am by Jeff Welty
Div. 1993), a New York court interpreting a similar statute found the evidence sufficient to convict an officer of official misconduct where “the defendant permitted [a drug dealer] to possess and sell drugs, by failing to arrest him. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Daniel S. Weinberger
For an analysis of the Acheson case, the relevant Supreme Court precedents, and the practical implications of the Supreme Court’s impending decision, see our article that was recently published in the New York Law Journal. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Daniel S. Weinberger
For an analysis of the Acheson case, the relevant Supreme Court precedents, and the practical implications of the Supreme Court’s impending decision, see our article that was recently published in the New York Law Journal. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Daniel S. Weinberger
For an analysis of the Acheson case, the relevant Supreme Court precedents, and the practical implications of the Supreme Court’s impending decision, see our article that was recently published in the New York Law Journal. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm by Thomas James
A New York court recently addressed the questions of sanctions for attorneys who submit briefs containing citations to non-existent “precedents” that were entirely made up by ChatGPT. [read post]