Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES" Results 181 - 200 of 780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 8:40 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion in June 2012, dealing with this issue. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:11 pm
Circuit to hand down its decision in Parker v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
In recent years, Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) and various state audit organizations have expanded their enforcement efforts. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But peaceful coexistence in a political unit offers itself as an ideal state of being. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
The United States Supreme Court decided yesterday a malicious prosecution/RICO case with a Fourth and Fifth Amendment implication yesterday: Wilkie v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
"Ample art" was the ridiculous phrase used by the pool reporter to describe the room Sarah Jessica Parker had had prepped to receive the President of the United States and 50 of his glamorous friends. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 10:29 am by Teresa Walrod
Parker, the Creek reservation’s boundaries remain intact. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
Both Prometheus and its intellectual forebear, Parker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Sullivan, Chin and Parker [dissenting in part] says: Our case law is clear: 'it is not the proper role of courts to encourage nullification.' United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
CV-07-1322 in the 415th District Court of Parker County, Texas; Lynn Welk, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:37 pm by Steve Statsinger
Here are the two most recent PC’s.In United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Conor McEvily
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]