Search for: "PITTS V. STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Chip Pitts is a lecturer in law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
McGinley’s complaint states that Kotz’s tactics “have caused SEC employees to fear the OIG’s false allegations and retaliations. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
State. standard. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
State. standard. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
In Veal v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Pitt. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Pitt. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Fiero v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Fiero v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:07 pm
McDonald Book Review Voter Fraud in the United States: Real or Imagined? [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:34 am
However, the cases of Ferguson v IC(EA/2010/0085) (on which, see my post here) and Brett v IC (EA/2008/0098) imposed an important gloss on that principle. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:56 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:56 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:56 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:53 pm
In Business Roundtable v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
In Pitts v. [read post]
