Search for: "People v Fields"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 9:30 pm
Stephen Field, J. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
For various reasons, the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Tuesday in Haywood v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
This may include testimony about field sobriety tests, or testimony from officers trained as drug recognition experts. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
v=Xh4CtTGAzKwRimjin-gang claims to be “The first-ever independent publication in the world written directly by people of North Korea. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
In a 2013 decision, State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
Turning to what the experts over at Eyewitness Identification are saying: last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:59 am
Cir. 1992) (holding that, for purposes of Fourth Amendment, retention of defendant's driver's license during police questioning constituted seizure); People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Presently, about 3,000 people a year are diagnosed. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Presently, about 3,000 people a year are diagnosed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:09 am
--Court: Court of Appeal of Florida, Second DistrictOpinion Date: 9/10/10Cite: Atomic Tattoos, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:34 am
Samsung and Oracle v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
The Court of Appeals added another decision to the long litany of cases addressing the search of a vehicle incident to arrest by publishing its January 2012 decision in People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Previously the test for “dishonesty” laid down in R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 required the prosecution to prove (1) that the actions of the defendant were dishonest by the lay objective standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people and (2) that the defendant must have realised that ordinary honest people would regard his behaviour as having fallen below those standards. [read post]