Search for: "People v. Bishop" Results 181 - 200 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The judge said that it was “of regret when people in public office comment about a person who is involved in a trial which is in progress”. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am by Marty Lederman
 (Mullet said that beard and hair cuttings would stop people from being “Amish hypocrites. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
But by awarding all the property to the people least able to maintain it and keep using it for church purposes, he took "neutral principles of law" to a truly Pyrrhic level. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the court concluded: All these people [plaintiffs, defendants, and potential witnesses] care. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
In Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 379, the primary question at issue was the meaning and effect of s.42, and in particular whether, where proceedings were brought without leave, it operated as a jurisdictional bar or merely as a procedural one. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Church Mouse Blog: How should we pick our bishops? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm by Elie Mystal
“These people claim to be representatives of a God of love but cover up pedophilia crimes? [read post]