Search for: "People v. Kelly" Results 181 - 200 of 767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm by Rick Hasen
As the Court of Appeals so eloquently stated in Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass’n v Detroit, 218 Mich App 263, 270; 553, NW2d 679 (1996): The wisdom of the principle of judicial restraint expressed by our Supreme Court in [Attorney General v Ingham Circuit Judge, 347 Mich 579; 81 NW2d 349 (1957)], is self-evident; the notion that our courts may precipitously intervene in the political arena and preempt a vote of the people is inconsistent with both… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 9:08 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court also denied rehearing in People v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:37 am
Kelly, however, had been convicted of two counts of grand larceny for theft of school property prior to being charged under Section 3020-a [People v Kelly, 72 AD2d 670]. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
“The Oregon Department of Veterans’ Affairs was originally created by the Legislature in 1945 to administer the home loan program, so it is an important part of our agency’s history and identity,” said ODVA director Kelly Fitzpatrick. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:12 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
 In People v Buie, the Michigan Supreme Court held that expert testimony by two-way video did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation because the defendant’s counsel waived that right. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lynn Jordan, Kelly IP, amicus counsel for the Motion Picture Association in MFGB Properties v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am by Dan Ernst
Cardozo ; an unappealing model of a hairy hand inspired by Hawkins v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"The opinion does set forth that the county has regularly had a policy of accommodating people with on-the-job injuries and not off-the-job injuries and even at the trial, the county can present that position," Kelly said. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 She explained that she does not agreed with the standardized test for stare decisis in Chief Justice Kelly’s opinion in Peterson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am by Jeanne Long
On June 22, the Court also decided People v Henix, No 144531. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm by Julie Lam
KAM Transport, Inc and in People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Here are the facts in last week’s 8th District decision in Middleburg Heights v. [read post]