Search for: "People v. London" Results 181 - 200 of 1,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm by NL
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2010] EWHC 907 (Admin) Or when is a child in need not a child in need? [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
Recent reports by Variety and by the Associated Press underscore the potential importance of the class action brought by Tanya Andersen against the RIAA, the record companies, Media Sentry and others, Andersen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief Constable… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
A nuisance action was upheld in Walker v Brewster (1867) 5 LR Eq 25 (Ch). where the defendant’s fetes attracted people who sat on a wall adjoining the plaintiff’s property, destroying their privacy. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The R (Bridges) v South Wales Police case A key test case on the use of FRS has been heard by the Administrative Court. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
“Peering” designates a legal practice of gazing at poor people. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:28 pm by Ilya Somin
City of New London, the objection is not that government has violated the rights of land or buildings, but those of the people who own them. [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:30 am by Jon Gelman
”On April 24, the patient traveled by plane from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to London, England then from London to Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am by James Romoser
The justices announced late Friday that they will hear oral argument on Nov. 30 in Trump v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
  I spoke at the underlying conference at University College London a couple of years ago and I'm pleased to see the book is slated to be available in March. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
 The main difference between Nokia v IPCom is this, though: the characters in soap operas are  not real people: their often bizarre and chaotic responses to the positions in which they find themselves are scripted and deprive them of any freedom of action. [read post]