Search for: "Rantanen" Results 181 - 200 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Professors Lee Petherbridge and David Schwartz have released a draft of their new study on the use of legal scholarship by the Federal Circuit. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:59 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen I’m excited to report that my academic institution, the University of Iowa, is hiring an in-house intellectual property attorney. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:34 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen I’ve been taking a break from blogging for the past few months to focus on teaching, research and service at the University of Iowa. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 11:08 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Last month, Pricewaterhouse Cooper released its annual patent litigation study. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 1:01 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen I’m currently spending much of my time attempting to untangle the mess that is the law around Section 284 enhanced damages (i.e.: willful infringement) and Section 285 attorney fee awards (i.e.: exceptional case determinations). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen This morning, the USPTO issued a substantial update to its December 2014 “Interim Guidance” on patent subject matter eligibility. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:44 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Saurabh Vishnubhakat (Texas A&M), Arti Rai (Duke) and Jay Kesan (Illinois) recently released a draft of their empirical study of Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court Proceedings. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:29 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen As I commented yesterday, the Federal Circuit's statistics page no longer provides information about the disposal of patent infringement appeals by merits panels. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:13 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Today, the patent office issued new instructions (download: PTO Alice Instructions) for patent examiners to follow when examining claims for compliance with Section 101. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:01 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen (Note: Given the almost certain passage of H.R. 1249 by the Senate, this analysis refers to that version of the pending patent legislation. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:40 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:51 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 11:54 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:31 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Genetics Institute, LLC v. [read post]