Search for: "Richard Pildes" Results 181 - 190 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2007, 11:25 am
As Levinson and Richard Pildes argue, if one wants to guarantee oversight, one has to redesign our institutions to take account of the reality of party systems. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:20 pm
Rick Pildes of NYU weighs in here, and Rick Hasen of Loyola Law School has his thoughts here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
FEC), Richard Pildes highlights how a seemingly technical insistence on the protection of "issue ads" may undo the whole edifice of regulation: [T]he analogy to the regulation of pornography is hard to miss here; there, the Court held that as long as sexual material had any other "redeeming social value," the First Amendment protected it. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 3:26 pm
Some early news reports: AP Bloomberg Reuters Legal Times (Tony Mauro/Law.com) Blogospheric reaction: Rick Pildes Marty Lederman Richard Briffault Bob Bauer Interest group reaction: Gerry Hebert, Campaign Legal Center Democracy 21 My initial reactions are here. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:27 am
The following post is from Richard H. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:20 am
Rick Pildes of NYU weighs in here, and Rick Hasen of Loyola Law School has his thoughts here. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 5:52 am
Next week, at Hebrew University, there is a fascinating conference entitled, Democracy and Rationality, which will include such political figures as Ehud Barak, Yuli Tamir and Dan Meridor, and scholars such as Samuel Issacharoff, speaking on "Democracy and the Problem of Collective Decision-Making"; Richard Pildes, and Michael Walzer. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:51 am
I'm thinking of testing a new voting heuristic based on Daryl Levinson & Richard Pildes, Separation of Parties, Not Powers, 119 Harv. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:50 am
I'm thinking of testing a new voting heuristic based on Daryl Levinson & Richard Pildes, Separation of Parties, Not Powers, 119 Harv. [read post]