Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 181 - 200
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
As Rick Pildes explains in his post today, there’s no reason to believe that the CU majority Justices care about the public outcry against the earlier decision. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:05 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes looks at the issues at stake in the court’s second major racial redistricting case this term, Cooper v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal; commentary on the issues involved in the case comes from Rick Pildes at Balkinization. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 10:49 pm
As Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson wrote in a splendid Harvard Law Review article a couple of years ago, the single best explanation for the utter failure of Congress to engage in oversight of the Executive branch during periods of "united government" (as we will have beginning January 20, 2009) is party loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
References: Accounting Board Challenged in Court by Fawn John Johnson and Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal False claims by Government to Supreme Court: PCAOB agency more powerful and independent than alleged by Hans Bader The Structure of Government and Today's Argument in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Case by Rick Pildes in Balkinization Considerations of PCAOB Posted by David Zaring in The Conglomerate Sarbanes-Oxley and its devilish details by Lyle Denniston in the SCOTUS… [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:39 am
Rick Pildes offered a pithy description of the cases: Two different federal courts had issued two decisions which left LA with no valid congressional map in place. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
In another post at the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes looks ahead to next month’s oral argument in Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Unfortunately, this hasn't happened and according to Rick Hasen's recent article "The Untimely Death of Bush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
” Rick Pildes has aptly described this provision as a loaded weapon, lying around for an unscrupulous state legislature to invoke. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes predicts that, if the Court strikes down the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:42 am
Update: Also at Lawfare, Rick Pildes argues that government silence undermines terrorism policies – an observation that I agree with, and which I make in similar terms at Lawfare as part of a comment on the possible operational role of the CIA in Afghanistan once US combat forces are formally gone. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Looking further forward, Balkinization's Rick Pildes previews Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:22 pm
In a recent post at the Election Law blog, prominent election law and constitutional law scholars Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Rick Pildes, and Brad Smith, summarize the bill's strengths and urge Congress to swiftly pass it: Here are the main features of the draft, which are a vast improvement on the existing Act from 1887. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
" The "logic" of our political order and the "separation of parties, not powers" (as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson our it, is that an opposition party has no reason whatsoever to cooperate (or, in their language, "collaborate," with a president of the opposite party, for the simple reason that president's will pick up (at least) 90% of the credit for any accomplishments. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Like Rick Pildes (himself borrowing from earlier political scientists), Aldrich also emphasizes the collapse of the schizoid Democratic Party following the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when the “big tent” of Northern liberals and Southern white racists disappeared, with many of the latter, of course, migrating to the Republican Party in the aftermath of Barry Goldwater’s vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and, more importantly, Richard… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am
And Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ Special Counsel regulations. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Rick Pildes outlined the options for congressional lawmakers who want to protect the Mueller investigation by law. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Gerken contrasts her “internalist” account of Windsor with “psychoanalytic” ones offered by scholars such as Rick Pildes, Michael Klarman, Mary Dudziak, and myself. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
Update: Rick Pildes from NYU has alerted me to his excellent post, found here on Balkinization, also arguing for a codification of the Miranda public safety exception in terrorist situations. [read post]
