Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 181 - 200
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
[ADDENDUM: I should have been clearer in my original post that the "institutional warfare" is a function of what Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have called the "separation of parties" more than the "separation of powers" per se. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes notes that this year marks Justice Clarence Thomas’s 25th anniversary on the court, and refers readers to an earlier symposium on Thomas’ jurisprudence. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes praises the ruling as a positive outcome from the Court’s “first foray into the way changing technologies, the internet in particular, should affect the potential conflicts between democracy, the First Amendment, political participation, and privacy,” while Ruthann Robson offers an interpretation of the ruling’s implications at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Josh Blackman notes that the opinion reaffirms the importance of the… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
Update: Rick Pildes from NYU has alerted me to his excellent post, found here on Balkinization, also arguing for a codification of the Miranda public safety exception in terrorist situations. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
” A contrary view comes from Richard Pildes, also at the Election Law Blog, who considers “today’s decision a major new precedent with broad implications, not just for racial gerrymandering issues, but for partisan gerrymandering ones potentially as well. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:06 am
Later in the interview I was asked about the prosecution’s theory and I expressed questions about it very much along the lines of Rick Pildes” Thanks for the clarification. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
” Ruthann Robson analyzes the opinion at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and at the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes and Justin Levitt do the same here and here, respectively. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The story of the 2006 Amendments’ passage is fascinating and well told by Nate Persily and Rick Pildes. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
My sense (channeling my inner Rick Pildes) is that these burdens are as much expressive harms as real financial burdens: the federal government is sending a message that these covered states are less entitled to their full sovereignty than other states. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:20 pm
You can watch the event that I moderated, from UCLA Law’s Safeguarding Democracy Project, here: [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
I've expressed my skepticism in numerous places, but you can find a fairly concise explanation at pages 696-701 of this article in the Catholic Law Review, which reproduces remarks I delivered at a 2019 Federalist Society panel with Professors Sai Prakash and Rick Pildes, as well as Judge Thomas Hardiman and then-Judge (now-Justice) Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
As Sam Issacharoff and Rick Pildes once pointed out with their characteristic insight, the Constitution is generally silent on important matters of representative democracy, and where it is not silent, the text “reflects the pre-modern world of democratic practice and the long-since rejected assumptions of that world on which the Constitution rests. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Rosalind Dixon and David Landau, Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy (Oxford University Press, 2021).Samuel IssacharoffAt first glance, the work of Ros Dixon and David Landau on constitutional borrowing appears to be centered on the role of constitutions and courts in securing or compromising democratic governance. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes maintains that “Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion … in Davis, striking down a federal criminal statute as unconstitutionally vague, bears a close relationship, which is likely to be missed, to his dissenting opinion last week on the delegation doctrine in the Gundy case. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 2:08 pm
Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson wrote a brilliant article several years ago in the Harvard Law Review on "the separation of parties, no powers. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 10:48 am
Commissioner Rick Pildes, a professor at New York University School of Law, commended the idea of term limits, mentioning that it seemed like there is “a great deal of support behind” it and that, although practitioners seem resistant to many ideas, most think term limits are acceptable. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
Richard Wolf of USA Today and Michael Doyle and David Lightman of McClatchey Newspapers offer historical perspective on disputes between presidents and the Court; at Balkanization, Rick Pildes warns against too-easy analogies to FDR, noting that “it is also important to realize just how different that moment was — in terms of both the Court and the political branches — than where we are for now. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Others are more expert on this issue than I, like my colleagues Sam Issacharoff and Rick Pildes, but I rely on their work and others in explaining this. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:37 am
First, as author Charlie Savage himself acknowledges (citing Rick Pildes), President Obama has not used executive power in the manner made controversial during the Bush Administration--namely, by acting in violation of a statute.Second, although the focus of the story purports to be about the use of "unilateral" executive power, the article itself includes only one example of the exercise of unilateral, constitutional authority by the current President--namely, his four… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes highlights the potential consequences of the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
