Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 181 - 200
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
But as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson accurate have pointed out, it's "separation of parties," not of powers, that define our system in most important respects. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:31 am
" And, in a similar vein (though not with regard to the Establishment Clause), Rick Pildes has voiced the worry that "in the political realm, judges and others cling . . . tenaciously to the fear that too much politics, or too competitive a political system, will bring instability, fragmentation, and disorder. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
[ADDENDUM: I should have been clearer in my original post that the "institutional warfare" is a function of what Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have called the "separation of parties" more than the "separation of powers" per se. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes observes that “[d]eciding to hear the Maryland case is a significant signal that a majority of the Court is not going to hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be non-justiciable (that is, inappropriate for judicial resolution)” in the first partisan-gerrymandering case this term, Gill v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
Update: Rick Pildes from NYU has alerted me to his excellent post, found here on Balkinization, also arguing for a codification of the Miranda public safety exception in terrorist situations. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm
” This picks up an idea that I think was first suggested a few days ago by Rick Pildes over at Balkinization. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes notes that this year marks Justice Clarence Thomas’s 25th anniversary on the court, and refers readers to an earlier symposium on Thomas’ jurisprudence. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:06 am
Later in the interview I was asked about the prosecution’s theory and I expressed questions about it very much along the lines of Rick Pildes” Thanks for the clarification. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
” A contrary view comes from Richard Pildes, also at the Election Law Blog, who considers “today’s decision a major new precedent with broad implications, not just for racial gerrymandering issues, but for partisan gerrymandering ones potentially as well. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The story of the 2006 Amendments’ passage is fascinating and well told by Nate Persily and Rick Pildes. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
” Ruthann Robson analyzes the opinion at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and at the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes and Justin Levitt do the same here and here, respectively. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
My sense (channeling my inner Rick Pildes) is that these burdens are as much expressive harms as real financial burdens: the federal government is sending a message that these covered states are less entitled to their full sovereignty than other states. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:20 pm
You can watch the event that I moderated, from UCLA Law’s Safeguarding Democracy Project, here: [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
I've expressed my skepticism in numerous places, but you can find a fairly concise explanation at pages 696-701 of this article in the Catholic Law Review, which reproduces remarks I delivered at a 2019 Federalist Society panel with Professors Sai Prakash and Rick Pildes, as well as Judge Thomas Hardiman and then-Judge (now-Justice) Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Rosalind Dixon and David Landau, Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy (Oxford University Press, 2021).Samuel IssacharoffAt first glance, the work of Ros Dixon and David Landau on constitutional borrowing appears to be centered on the role of constitutions and courts in securing or compromising democratic governance. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
As Sam Issacharoff and Rick Pildes once pointed out with their characteristic insight, the Constitution is generally silent on important matters of representative democracy, and where it is not silent, the text “reflects the pre-modern world of democratic practice and the long-since rejected assumptions of that world on which the Constitution rests. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes maintains that “Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion … in Davis, striking down a federal criminal statute as unconstitutionally vague, bears a close relationship, which is likely to be missed, to his dissenting opinion last week on the delegation doctrine in the Gundy case. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes defends the relevance of Kagan’s academic experience. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes highlights the potential consequences of the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes remarks that during oral argument in Abbott v. [read post]
