Search for: "Robbins v Robbins"
Results 181 - 200
of 703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
Bridgeman, associate general counsel, Freddie MacDeborah V. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
Shannon Pratt must be clicking his heals. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Robbins v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:34 am
Ford v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 6:24 am
” Other decision testing New York City’s Zero Tolerance Drug Policy include:Roberts v New York City Office of Collective Bargaining, 113 AD3d 97, [Fire Department's determination of an appropriate penalty for illegal drug use relates to its primary mission of providing public safety]; New York City Fire Department v Armbruster, OATH Index #1350/12 [Firefighter who tested positive for cocaine in a random workplace drug test failed to demonstrate that he consumed the… [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 7:44 pm
Robbins, of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:08 am
Robbins (preview here). [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Windsor" I'm sure that I'm continuing to miss new pieces on United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
Robbins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Robbins, 173 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir. 1999). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
Robbins, 2009 Ore. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
Here’s a brief from the State of Arizona in the Arizona COA defending a decision to deny state unemployment benefits to a former Navajo Nation elected official who is unemployed after losing an election (Robbins v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), which allows deference to administrative agencies to interpret and enforce the statutes they are charged to administer, a principle relevant to the Sentencing Commission and Guidelines by way of Stinson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
” Law Book Exchange's November 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History is here.ICYMI: An essay on Gong Lum v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:17 pm
See, e.g., McTear v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:14 pm
App. 2011); see also Napper, 322 S.W.3d at 242 (citing Estrada v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:57 pm
The petition of the day is: Title: Schering Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:01 pm
I am convinced that, as Robbins puts it, “[v]isual effects . . . are as critical an element of persuasion as proper grammar and adherence to the rules of court and citation form. [read post]
