Search for: "STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE."
Results 181 - 200
of 308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Some states qualify their safe harbors with modifying adverbs, such as "specifically," "expressly," or "affirmatively" (Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:14 am
It is also about what the state of Fourth Amendment law was at the time of this incident, which began in Arkansas before crossing over the state line into Tennessee. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
Harris to contrast what happened there with what happened in Arkansas and Tennessee three years earlier, the Department argued. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
Pfizer, 716 F.3d 1087, 1096 (8th Cir. 2013) (remanding issue for consideration by district court) (applying Arkansas law), Fullington v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm
Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Tennessee 13-5086Issue: (1) Whether, in proceedings under Atkins v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm
Conversely, many so-called “red states,” or those that have a significant gun culture — such as Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Wyoming — impose a duty to retreat. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:44 am
For example, following the Warren Court’s decision, the people of Arkansas amended their Constitution to instruct the Arkansas legislature to resist “in every constitutional manner the un-constitutional desegregation decisions … of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:19 pm
The petition of the day is: Plumhoff v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm
In the short term, we can expect to see more states start to limit FOIA requests to citizens only (for those keeping score, states already doing so include, in addition to Virginia: Alabama, Arkansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Tennessee and, though the Third Circuit threw out their law, Delaware). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Now, according to critics of such laws, only the states of Arkansas, Tennessee, and Virginia continue to enforce their laws. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Compare this level of state participation with, for example, the amicus brief filed by all forty-nine other states in Maryland v. [read post]
