Search for: "STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE." Results 181 - 200 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2013, 11:44 am
  For example, following the Warren Court’s decision, the people of Arkansas amended their Constitution to instruct the Arkansas legislature to resist “in every constitutional manner the un-constitutional desegregation decisions … of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Plumhoff v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
  In the short term, we can expect to see more states start to limit FOIA requests to citizens only (for those keeping score, states already doing so include, in addition to Virginia: Alabama, Arkansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Tennessee and, though the Third Circuit threw out their law, Delaware). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Now, according to critics of such laws, only the states of Arkansas, Tennessee, and Virginia continue to enforce their laws. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
  Compare this level of state participation with, for example, the amicus brief filed by all forty-nine other states in Maryland v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:35 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Los estados y territorios que participarán en esta conferencia son: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Carolina del Norte, Carolina del Sur, Colorado, Connecticut, Dakota del Norte, Dakota del Sur, Delaware, Distrito de Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Islas Marianas del Norte, Islas Vírgenes, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska,… [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
 But states like Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Mississippi continued to openly discriminate against blacks in all aspects of education, employment and life. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
”  Id. at 585-86.ArkansasThe Arkansas Supreme Court avoided the issue in Adams v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:16 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Tenn.) alleging sex discrimination on behalf of a class of present and former female Wal-Mart retail store employees who have been subjected to gender discrimination as a result of regional policies and/or practices in “Region 43” — a region allegedly centered in Middle and Western Tennessee, and including portions of Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, and Mississippi. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:43 am by John Day
The Court said that As the unanimous [Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. [read post]
” The court also refused to dismiss claims under antitrust and consumer protection laws in eight states: Arkansas, Florida, Minnesota, New Mexico, Tennessee, California, Massachusetts and Vermont. [read post]