Search for: "Scales v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 2,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Anne Egeler
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Larry
Customs examined the factors set out in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by David Markus
United States, has restored over the past decade a meaningful and responsible role to judges at sentencing. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by Dave Maass
Instead, EFF and the ACLU point to a series of recent key decisions—including the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 1:02 pm by Donrich Thaldar
Projects like FinnGen in Finland, the UK Biobank, and the All of Us initiative in the United States are charting new frontiers in precision medicine, enabling researchers to unlock the genetic codes underlying a wide array of diseases. [read post]