Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 181 - 200
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 7:02 pm
" I flagged this possibility in a post earlier this week: My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 7:45 am
Responding to an analysis by Hilary Hurd and Benjamin Wittes Seth Barrett Tillman argued that Senate rules do not require a full trial, and do not equate “removal” with “disqualification. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:34 am
Seth Barrett Tillman suggested that the Senate rules on impeachment do not require a full trial and that the Senate votes separately on removal and disqualification. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:28 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained why the allegations–trading one public act for another public act–do not meet the specific requirements for bribery. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
“Defining a Theory of ‘Bribery’ for Impeachment”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay on Lawfare. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
I thank Adam Liptak and the NYTimes for bringing up this interesting matter./3 — Seth Barrett Tillman (@SethBTillman) November 25, 2019 [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 3:12 pm
This week, I co-authored two essays with Seth Barrett Tillman on somewhat obscure legal questions. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:50 am
[Seth Barrett Tillman and I defend the constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act in Atlantic] Seth Barrett Tillman and I defend the constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act in the Atlantic. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:12 pm
” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this guest post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:15 am
Over at Balkinization, Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have a long post addressing an unlikely problem: “Could Justice Thomas Preside over President Trump’s Impeachment Trial? [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:49 am
[Seth Barrett Tillman and I suggest that the answer is yes.] [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am
[Resolutions to approve the acceptance of foreign gifts and emoluments must be presented to the President] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that "[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:55 pm
Over the past two years, Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and I have written extensively about the practices of President Washington. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Since January 2017, litigants have alleged that President Trump is violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
[DOJ’s Schrödinger’s Briefs in the Emoluments Clauses litigation are in tension with a 2009 OLC Opinion] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] In a recent post, we explained that the Congressional Research Service ("CRS") has shifted its position concerning the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
[CRS has relied on Tillman’s Scholarship about who holds an “Office . . . under” the United States] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that "no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
