Search for: "State v. Small" Results 181 - 200 of 15,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The effect is slight, though, because the violent crime index is dominated by robbery and aggravated assault, and the contribution of rape to the total number is small. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
On the small tract of land that remains of Britain’s colony of Cyprus, six families of refugees are housed. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employeesMount Lemmon Fire District Petitioner v John Guido, Et Al., Cite as: 586 U. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employeesMount Lemmon Fire District Petitioner v John Guido, Et Al., Cite as: 586 U. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:53 pm
I joined a group of law professors and public-interest groups that filed an amicus brief Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:55 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Holder: Whether a conviction under a provision of state law that encompasses but is not limited to the distribution of a small amount of marijuana without remuneration constitutes... [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:19 am
The Washington State Supreme Court has withdrawn its January Opinion in the long-running Yousoufian v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This standard applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:19 am by Ariel Greenberg
Brooks stated that he has "no idea" whether the Supreme Court will take on Prince v. [read post]