Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 3,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 7:42 pm by Cara Horowitz
California Air Resources Board, et al., San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:01 pm by Robin Mashal
Huang Cho Hong, et al., in the Superior Court of State of California, County of Los Angeles, Central Judicial District, Case no. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am by James Goodman
The court found that the real party in interest did not meet the evidentiary burden imposed by the California Supreme Court in Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
Pretty much everyone -- including but not limited to Earl Warren to Stanley Mosk -- thought that California didn't allow one person to run for two different offices at the same election.But the Court of Appeal decides today that that's wrong; that one person can, indeed, run for multiple offices if s/he so decides. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:37 pm by Howard Friedman
Cody, (ND CA, Dec. 18, 2020), a California federal district court, applying the Younger abstention doctrine, refused to issue a temporary restraining order against state court proceedings enforcing a state court's preliminary injunction against a church. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am by John Jascob
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
Strauss of the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, in which Judge Strauss granted motions for summary filed by Bayer and several generic drug defendants. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:07 pm by Dave Maass
Superior Court, arguing that these short retention periods thwart the government transparency measures enshrined in California law and the state’s Constitution. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
On September 30, 2010, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed a superior court ruling that California Constitution Section 28 taxes do not apply to surplus lines insurers. [read post]