Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
The recent Supreme Court term resulted in a number of very important decisions that will impact companies engaging in advertising and marketing in the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
Discounted cash flow analysis has been criticized and rejected by the New Jersey Tax Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 10:15 am by Robert Trautmann
United States Senator Robert Menendez – the senior senator from New Jersey, today issued a letter seeking a full investigation into the fraudulent altering of reports by carrier friendly experts. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
Section 17:22-6.64 as it applies to surplus lines premium taxation such that ‎“[i]f a surplus lines policy covers risk or exposures in [New Jersey] and other states, where [New Jersey] is the home ‎state … the tax payable pursuant to this section shall be based on the total United States premium for the applicable ‎policy. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:53 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Since the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
New Jersey companies utilizing the services of temporary workers contracted through a staffing agency or temporary help service firm should be aware that additional state-mandated protections covering certain temporary workers took effect on Saturday, August 5, 2023. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Richard S. Zackin
United States Legal Services Group, where the New Jersey Supreme Court held that an arbitration agreement must reflect a “clear mutual understanding of the ramifications” of the parties’ mutual assent to waive adjudication by a court of law. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied defendants motion for summary judgment in favor of the employee. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:44 am by luiza
The District Court in New Jersey had granted PharMerica’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Silver’s allegations were barred under the False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar. [read post]