Search for: "State v. Board of Valuation"
Results 181 - 200
of 470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am
” In her subsequent lawsuit, Blaustein claimed that Thalheimer and his hand-picked directors on the board were motivated by Thalheimer’s personal concern that a buy-out of Blaustein at full value would undermine stock valuation discounts taken in gift tax returns for shares that had been gifted to members of the Thalheimer family. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio agreed, and stated that an appraisal from a licensed appraiser would be the best evidence of the personalty’s value. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
" Indiana State Board of Education v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:56 am
Best v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:49 pm
Regarding which documents must be produced for each category’s stated purpose, he said they must be “essential and sufficient to [its] stated purpose. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Holland, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, May 27, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, legislation, Monetary policy, State regulation Significant Amendments to Private Fund Adviser Reporting on Form PF Posted by Diane Blizzard and Radhika Kshatriya, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Sunday, May 28, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Form PF, Investment advisers, Private equity, Private funds, SEC enforcement The Imperfect CEO Posted by Justus… [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Holland, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, May 27, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, legislation, Monetary policy, State regulation Significant Amendments to Private Fund Adviser Reporting on Form PF Posted by Diane Blizzard and Radhika Kshatriya, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Sunday, May 28, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Form PF, Investment advisers, Private equity, Private funds, SEC enforcement The Imperfect CEO Posted by Justus… [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:29 pm
Eric Prokopi and United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:26 pm
In a sharply worded reply memorandum filed Tuesday in the forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:48 am
As stated by the court in Testa v Cincinnati, “The focus in those cases was not on the revenue realized as a result of the challenged uses, but on the incidental character of the private use in relation to the public purpose. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:38 am
Georgia State Board of Equalization, No. 06-1287 (railroad property valuation) MeadWestvaco Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:28 pm
” Aronson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
The court doesn’t insist that the board members should have stated they were not independent. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
The following day, July 10, the Board considered the $48 per share proposal and valuation materials prepared by Lyondell's management in a Board meeting lasting slightly less than one hour. [read post]
19 May 2012, 4:33 pm
Arbitration Clauses Federal Court Upholds Arbitration Clause In Mortenson v. [read post]
