Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 181 - 200
of 61,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 11:00 pm
In Alden v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 am
In an important new ruling, the Third Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
Trump v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:55 pm
Doug ended his post by noting that "the only thing missing" from my analysis was an assessment of what the Court's ruling in Begay might mean for the soon-to-be-decided United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:37 am
Phillips v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
See, e.g., Ray v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:50 am
Motor Vehicles OWI; prior convictions Prior suspensions of a driver's operating privilege under another state's 'zero tolerance' law are convictions within the meaning of secs. 343.307(1)(d) and 340.01(9r). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:32 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:19 am
Hat tip to Phil Usher and Wired.comThe United States Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Jammie Thomas's case, Capitol Records v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
”)(Internally citing to State v. [read post]
