Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 181 - 200 of 4,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2007, 4:42 am
Here, as in Valsamaki, there was virtually no evidence of any kind that any such extreme circumstances existed, but rather it appeared that the City was using quick-take proceedings to gain a litigation and negotiating advantage rather than proceeding from and with the requisite justification demanded by the federal and state due process requirements, and the specific language of the statute.The opinion is available in PDF format. [read post]
14 Mar 2006, 1:44 pm by Tom Lincoln
The United States Sentencing Commission has released a Report on the Impact of United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:06 am by Dan Farber
Dissenters were quick to point out the contrast with Mass. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:35 pm
 The New Jersey Supreme Court just released its opinion in Tannen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The answer to today's question -- at least in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals -- comes to us from a decision rendered Tuesday in Knepper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
Did she make any use in commerce in the United States? [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock Copyright * Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:12 pm by B.W. Barnett
While I'm focused elsewhere, here's a quick look at some published holdings from around the state: Confession Valid Despite Illegal Arrest Monge v. [read post]