Search for: "State v. Weight"
Results 181 - 200
of 7,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
It moreover meant that considerable weight should be given to the statement in s 117B(5) as to the approach which should normally be adopted. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:08 pm
Pension Fund v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
Yates v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
" Turning to the authorities, Mr Justice Moylan stated (at paragraph 61): "My task is to determine "the division of property which best achieves the fair overall outcome": Charman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
US v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Newell Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:11 am
Additional Resources: Collins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Second, it incorrectly bound itself by the finding of precariousness by attaching “little weight” to her private life whereas it had discretion under statute to attach greater weight in her case. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:14 pm
It in fact became the stated position of the Clinton administration. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:38 am
Cross Constr., 294 A.D.2d at 25-26, 743 N.Y.S.2d 212).Laezzo v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The decision is Gross v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
Saudi Arabia, and now Jones v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:11 am
From last week's Mississippi Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm
Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections, No. 11-14498, a case where the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida found that Florida’s death penalty statute violated Ring v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
As such, the decision cannot warrant precedential weight under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
Additional Resources: Barneck v. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part Two
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
