Search for: "State v. Words" Results 181 - 200 of 36,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2019, 4:12 am by Larry
United States has already had some coverage on the blog. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
Choudhary and others v Bhatter and others [2009] EWCA Civ 510; [2009] WLR (D) 326 "The opening words of art 22 of the Judgments Regulation, as to the courts which were to have 'exclusive jurisdiction', constituted a direction intended to apply as between the courts of those member states which were bound by the Regulation; and [...] [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
As you know, we've had a few words to say about the Supreme Court's decision last week in Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:00 pm by Powers Law Group
In a new case earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Nielsen v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
They were murdered.The distinction, the words, the language matters. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
BNA's Feb. 20 Daily Report for Executives [subscription required] discusses the options available to the Internal Revenue Service after the Minnesota federal district court decision last month in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Deeds not words: Let's have some action on prisoners voting rightsRobert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has to extend voting rights to sentenced prisoners in England and Wales. [218573]Bridget Prentice: Following the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of Hirst v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm by Jim Lindgren
  The words "Congress" and "State Legislature" in Articles I, II, and IV refer to national and state lawmaking processes and not to particular institutions. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
As readers of this blog probably know by now, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:32 am by Zachary Spilman
During the oral argument at CAAF on Monday 12 December in United States v. [read post]