Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Sonya Strickland, a Junction City public defender, won in State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am by stu@crimapp.com
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
Although the district court denied relief (concluding that Wilson could not demonstrate “prejudice” under the Supreme Court’s Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
In 2004, the Supreme Court of Virginia denied Bell's habeas corpus petition on the ground that Bell was unable to satisfy either prong of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm by carie
Case 2:04-cv-01156- GLF-MRA Document 594 Filed 10/23/09 Page 1 of 4UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RICHARD COOEY, et al., Plaintiffs Case No. 2:04-cv-1156 JUDGE GREGORY FROST v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:57 pm
To analyze whether the ineffective assistance rises to a Sixth Amendment violation, courts must follow a two-part test set out in Strickland v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am by Kate Howard
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The state courts failed to correctly apply the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]