Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 16,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2022, 7:30 am
Jackson overruling Roe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:07 pm
In a brief opinion, the 11th Circuit found for the government and reversed the district court: In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
This recently enacted legislation is indicative of strong support in Texas for the development of CCUS projects and helps clear the path for onshore and offshore CCUS deployment within the state. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:40 am
United States in 2011. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
Law Lessons from State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:44 am
inDoc=/ars/25/00112.htm&Title=25&DocType=ARS Vandever v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Jadeja v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am
[This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post: States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:16 am
United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:16 am
United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:55 am
The UPC Central Division also takes a strong stance on the patentability of therapeutic antibody inventions in Europe. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
State of Alaska, No. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:19 pm
In State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 9:04 pm
As the court stated: While we recognize the strong policy... [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 11:29 am
Especially since my strong, strong sense is that, regardless of what the law is, the factfinder is going to hold it against the patient if they do not get up on the stand and demonstrate some passive lucidity.In short, if they say you're still crazy, you've got a right, but you'd be crazy to invoke it. [read post]
