Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 181 - 200 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am by Hilary Hurd, Elena Chachko
” In addition, Russia has accused the United States of violating the INF. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States  (Federal Fiduciary Duty)Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County  (Rights-of-Way)Wilhite v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
For more information, see United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
For more information, see United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Jurisdiction) County of Amador, CA v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Miriam Siefert analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:19 am by Scott Bomboy
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, its name came up 48 times during arguments, in the case’s official court transcript. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Eluding the proper scope of federal jurisdiction: United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Federal Trust; Water Rights) Upper Lake Pomo Association v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:00 am by Kevin Goldberg
Google, Inc., the case that adopted that test, which was decided by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in 2006 and affirmed by the Ninth Circuit in 2007. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am by Amy Howe
Frost (Nov. 5) – Whether the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, a federal law governing the National Park Service’s authority over lands in Alaska, bars the National Park Service from regulating other land – owned by the state, native corporations or private owners – within the boundaries of Alaska national parks. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 10:20 am
The 9th Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued an opinion recently in Goudelock v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
According to SCOTUS Watch, which “tracks the public statements made by United States senators about how they plan to vote,” 31 Republicans are “likely yes” and 16 (including McCain) are “definitely yes” on the confirmation. [read post]