Search for: "United States v. James" Results 181 - 200 of 5,303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 8:32 am by Mark Sorkin
Wilson, citing at length their contention that the record-high level of incarceration in the United States has been beneficial. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:59 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Indeed, he would resign on August 9, just over two weeks after United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm by Dan Ernst
Maryland, will be held Thursday, October 9, 2014 at 6:00 pm in the Chamber of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
” by Eric Goldman “No ESC” by  James Grimmelmann “The Satellite Has No Conscience: §230 in a World of ‘Alternative Facts’” by  Laura A. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm by legalinformatics
In the visualization above, the root or sink node is the famed United States Supreme Court decision Marbury v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:09 pm by Rick Hasen
Bloomberg BNA: “Challengers of Montana’s ban on corporate spending in state election campaigns will file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court “promptly,” seeking to overrule a state court decision that it is in conflict with the high court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:35 am by Wells Bennett
Pohl issued an amended docketing order in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:09 am
The lead majority opinion begins, "Both parties to this case are members of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]